|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 349-352
The influence of occupational stress factors on nicotine dependence among students of health and nonhealth care professional colleges
Amandeep Chopra1, Manav Lakhanpal2, Nidhi Gupta3, Varun Suri4, Gurwant Kaur3, Swati Bhudhiraja5
1 Department of Public Health Dentistry, National Dental College and Hospital, Dera Bassi, Punjab, India
2 Department of Public Health Dentistry, Teerthankar Dental College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
3 Department of Public Health Dentistry, SDDHDC, Panchkula, India
4 Department of Public Health Dentistry, MM Dental College, Mullana, India
5 Private Dental Practitioner, Conservative and Endodontist, Ambala, Haryana, India
|Date of Web Publication||24-Nov-2015|
Department of Public Health Dentistry, National Dental College and Hospital, Dera Bassi, SAS Nagar, Mohali, Punjab
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objectives: To study the relationship between perceived job stress measured using Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) scale and nicotine dependence using Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) scale among students of health and nonhealth care professional colleges. Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried on convenient sample of 408 health and nonhealth care professional who were current smokers. Nicotine dependence was measured using the FTND. The extent of the stress factors experienced at work was assessed using the ERI. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Occupational stress factors are actually associated with higher levels of nicotine dependence (odds ratio = 4.523). The degree of nicotine dependence and stress imbalance was found to be more among health care professional students as compared to nonhealth care professional students (P < 0.05). Being religious was found to have a significant effect in reducing nicotine dependence. Conclusion: Being religious, having low occupational stress and being nonhealth care professional have a significant effect on the prevention of nicotine dependence.
Keywords: Effort-Reward Imbalance, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, health and nonhealth care, professional students, job stress, nicotine dependence
|How to cite this article:|
Chopra A, Lakhanpal M, Gupta N, Suri V, Kaur G, Bhudhiraja S. The influence of occupational stress factors on nicotine dependence among students of health and nonhealth care professional colleges. Niger Med J 2015;56:349-52
|How to cite this URL:|
Chopra A, Lakhanpal M, Gupta N, Suri V, Kaur G, Bhudhiraja S. The influence of occupational stress factors on nicotine dependence among students of health and nonhealth care professional colleges. Niger Med J [serial online] 2015 [cited 2021 Feb 24];56:349-52. Available from: https://www.nigeriamedj.com/text.asp?2015/56/5/349/170391
| Introduction|| |
"Tobacco is an only legally available product that kills people." Tobacco use is a risk factor for 6 of the 8 leading causes of death. Every 6 s, 1 person dies as the result of tobacco consumption in the world. If the current trends continue and necessary actions are not taken tobacco-induced attributable deaths are projected to rise from 5.4 million in 2004 to 8.3 million in 2030.
Tobacco dependence is a multi-dimensional addiction that is determined by individual, genetic, psychosocial, and behavioral aspects of dependence on smoking or nicotine.
Nicotine dependence has been found to be an important predictor of successful cessation of smoking among smokers. So, it is important to measure the various aspects of nicotine dependence. "Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence" (FTND) is an internationally recognized and statistically validated instrument for assessing the degree of nicotine dependence in smokers.,
Psychosocial factors such as work stress have an influence on the initiation and extent of smoking. This may be attributable to the effect of job stress on nicotine dependence. Thus by measuring job stress it is possible to identify risk group and further to intervene using measures targeted at that particular group. "Effort-Reward Imbalance" (ERI) scale has been successfully tested and examined in many social epidemiological studies for assessing psychosocial stress experienced at work.,
A systematic search in various database reveal that no study has been carried out assessing the relationship between psychological stress and nicotine dependence among health and nonhealth care professional college students.
In the light of the above facts, this investigation was designed to study the relationship between perceived job stress measured using ERI scale (ERI-S) and nicotine dependence using FTND scale among the students of health and nonhealth care professional colleges.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted from January to March 2014 among 6 conveniently selected professional colleges (Nursing, Dental, Pharmacy, Diploma, Engineering, B. Ed) in Barwala, Panchkula, who were primarily smokers. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee and informed written consent was obtained from the participants.
Data were collected by means of questionnaire which was divided into three areas of enquiry on:
- Demographic details including age, gender, and profession. Religiousness (religious/nonreligious) was measured through self-reported religiousness question asking about the importance of religion and faith to life with two possible answers: "Somewhat or very important" to "not important." A note was made at the end of demographic details that "If you are a current smoker than proceed with the next question otherwise return the questionnaire"
- Nicotine dependence was assessed using the FTND, a psychometrically evaluated instrument used to determine the degree of cigarette consumption and the inability to abstain from nicotine use ,
- Job stress was measured using short version of the ERI-S, which consists 16 four-point Likert scale (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, and strongly agree) which corresponds to "effort," "reward," and "over-commitment" dimensions. To evaluate the ERI experienced by study participants, only the scores of the effort and reward scales were needed; an effort-reward ratio was then computed using a standardized syntax.
A pilot study was conducted 1-month prior to the original study with a sample of 30 individuals who were not part of the main sample to know feasibility and validity of questionnaire before the main study. Based on pilot study sample size was estimated for the main study (n = 408). A prior permission was obtained from concerned college authorities. From each college, 68 students were selected by convenient sampling technique. Those participating remained anonymous.
The questionnaire was distributed to study subjects during their free time. The purpose of the study and all the terms used in the questionnaire were explained to the students. The students were also ensured complete confidentiality and anonymity of the participants 25 min were given to each person to fill the questionnaire. Such filled questionnaires were collected on the same day.
For the purpose of statistical analysis data was dichotomized as health (Nursing, Dental, and Pharmacy) and nonhealth care professional students (Diploma, Engineering, B. Ed).
The individual items of the FTND were combined into a sum score for the multivariate analysis. Scores of 1-3 represent smokers with low nicotine dependence; scores of 4-5 represent a moderate dependence and scores of 6-10 represents high dependence on nicotine. In order to compare workers with low nicotine dependence to those with heavy dependence, the FTND sum score was dichotomized at the value of 5 for the logistic regression.,
The ERI analysis was conducted as follows: An effort-reward ratio was then computed using a standardized syntax. Values over 1 indicate an imbalance between effort and reward.
The differences among variables were assessed by the Chi-square test. A logistic regression model was calculated using all sociodemographic variables. Statistical data were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 (Chicago, USA).
| Results|| |
A total of 392 currently smoking participants completed the questionnaire. The mean age of study sample was 22.1 ± 3.2 years (males 72% and females 38%). The study sample consisted of 52.1% health professionals and 47.9% nonhealth professionals.
The mean value of FTND score was 3.25 (range 1-5) suggesting moderate nicotine dependence. The degree of nicotine dependence was found to be significantly higher for medical profession students as compared to nonhealth care professional students (P< 0.05) [Figure 1].
Results of ERI-S show that 17.2% of study participants do not experience an imbalance between effort and reward (up to a value of 0.99). The ERI was found to be more in students of health care profession (87.1%) compared to nonhealth care professionals (78.3%) which was found to be statistically significant (P< 0.05). The mean value of the effort-reward ratio is 1.88.
The results of the logistic regression are shown in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Results of the logistic regression model, nicotine dependence and ERI (n = 392)|
Click here to view
The ERI was found to be associated with nicotine dependence (odds ratio [OR] = 4.523; P = 0.023). The amount of explained variance in this model is 23.1% (Nagelkerke Pseudo-R). The specificity of the model is 64.6%, and the sensitivity is 57.4%.
The model also demonstrates that being religious and being nonhealth care professional have a significant effect on the prevention of nicotine dependence [Table 1].
| Discussion|| |
The present study was conducted to study the relationship between perceived job stress measured using ERI-S and nicotine dependence using FTND scale among the students of health and nonhealth care professional colleges.
This study used a convenience sampling technique, to ensure equal representation of health and nonhealth care professionals as the intention was to explore perceptions by these professionals.
In this study, only young adults were included because of the potential impact of nicotine dependence on this age group and the idea of the possible relationship between reducing job stress and successful smoking cessation.
The results of our study revealed that an ERI at work are strongly associated with increased nicotine dependence (OR = 4.53) which was in concordance to study done by Kouvonen et al. This may be attributable to the effect of job stress on nicotine dependence. That is, high levels of job stress could produce and/or maintain high levels of nicotine dependence among smokers, and could result in difficulty in smoking cessation.
The logistic regressions in our study also indicate that not being religious as significant risk factors for nicotine dependence which was in concordance to Blay et al., who found that religious affiliation is associated with a decrease in the frequency of tobacco usage.
An health care professional students were associated with high nicotine dependence and ERI as compared to nonhealth care professionals. The health care professional students were found to be 1.186 times the risk of having nicotine dependence as compared to nonhealth care professional students. This could be due to fact that health care professionals were exposed to a high level of psychological job demand and regarded tobacco smoking as a way of stress management would not look for other measures to reduce their stress. Moreover, this might emphasize the relationship between psychological job demand and nicotine dependence.
This study has some limitations, such as the convenient sampling method and limited information about the professional backgrounds and working conditions of individuals.
However, strength of our study remains in the fact that it provides an overview on relationship between perceived job stress and nicotine dependence among health and nonhealth care professional students for the first time and can prove to be a benchmark for future comparisons by the public health personnel and decision makers.
| Conclusion|| |
A possible relationship exists between job stress and nicotine dependence both in health care and nonhealth care professional students. Thus, workplace smoking cessation programs should take account of the influence of job stress on nicotine dependence, and measures to curb nicotine dependence resulting from coping with job stress should be introduced into the programs.
The stress management would be a useful element of smoking cessation programs that should target both health and nonhealth care professionals who smoke and are dependent on tobacco. Cessation programs among these adults can be made effective by helping them learn appropriate methods for managing psychological demands, or their administrators might assist them by relieving them of their perceived psychological demands.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
World Health Organization. Ten highlights in health statistics. World Health Statistics 2008. Part 1. World Health Organization; Geneva 2008.
Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med 2006;3:e442.
Hourani LL, Yuan H, Bray RM, Vincus AA. Psychosocial correlates of nicotine dependence among men and women in the U.S. naval services. Addict Behav 1999;24:521-36.
Batra V, Patkar AA, Berrettini WH, Weinstein SP, Leone FT. The genetic determinants of smoking. Chest 2003;123: 1730-9.
Fagerstrom KO, Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT. Nicotine addiction and its assessment. Ear Nose Throat J 1990;69: 763-5.
Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86:1119-27.
Rödel A, Siegrist J, Hessel A, Brähler E. Fragebogen zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen. Psychometrische Testung an einer repräsentativen deutschen Stichprobe. [Psychometric test of the questionnaire measuring effort-reward imbalance at work in a representative German sample]. ZDDP 2004;25:277-38.
Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, et al. The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:1483-99.
Radzius A, Gallo JJ, Epstein DH, Gorelick DA, Cadet JL, Uhl GE, et al. A factor analysis of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Nicotine Tob Res 2003;5: 255-40.
Sledjeski EM, Dierker LC, Costello D, Shiffman S, Donny E, Flay BR, et al
. Predictive validity of four nicotine dependence measures in a college sample. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;87:10-9.
Niedhammer I, Tek ML, Starke D, Siegrist J. Effort-reward imbalance model and self-reported health: Cross-sectional and prospective findings from the GAZEL cohort. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:1531-41.
Tsutsumi A, Kayaba K, Nagami M, Miki A, Kawano YO, Odagiri Y, et al
. The effort-reward imbalance model: Experience in Japanese working population. J Occup Health 2002;44:398-407.
Kouvonen A, Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Pentti J, Vahtera J. Work stress, smoking status, and smoking intensity: An observational study of 46,190 employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:63-9.
Blay SL, Batista AD, Andreoli SB, Gastal FL. The relationship between religiosity and tobacco, alcohol use, and depression in an elderly community population. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2008;16:934-43.
|This article has been cited by|
||Relating oral hygiene, gingival, and periodontal status with nicotine dependence among smokers - A cross-sectional study
| ||ChibuzorOsediye Boi-Ukeme,ClementChinedu Azodo |
| ||Journal of Clinical Sciences. 2020; 17(4): 127 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Anxiolytic consumption is associated with tobacco smoking and severe nicotine dependence. Results from the national French medical students (BOURBON) study
| ||A. Bourbon,L. Boyer,P. Auquier,M. Boucekine,V. Barrow,C. Lançon,G. Fond |
| ||Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2019; : 109645 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Work Stress and Depressive Symptoms in Fishermen With a Smoking Habit: A Mediator Role of Nicotine Dependence and Possible Moderator Role of Expressive Suppression and Cognitive Reappraisal
| ||Hongjuan Jiang,Sailan Li,Juan Yang |
| ||Frontiers in Psychology. 2018; 9 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|