Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 289

 

Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Advertise Contacts Login 
     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 246-250

Postexposure prophylaxis for Lassa fever: Experience from a recent outbreak in Nigeria


1 Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, University of Jos/Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
2 Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Jos/Jos University Teaching Hospital, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
3 Department of Microbiology, University of Jos, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, Arnas Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy
5 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom

Correspondence Address:
Samson E Isa
Department of Medicine, Jos University Teaching Hospital, PMB 2073, Jos, Plateau State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0300-1652.188362

Rights and Permissions

Background: Secondary transmission of Lassa fever (LF) occurs in the community and in health-care facilities, and is associated with high fatality in Nigeria. We investigated the role of oral ribavirin postexposure prophylaxis (orPEP) in preventing LF among the primary contacts of confirmed cases from December 2015 to March 2016. Materials and Methods: Epidemiological and clinical data of LF contacts were prospectively collected. However, information regarding ribavirin adverse effects (AEs) were collected retrospectively through a telephone interview. High-risk contacts were clinically monitored ΁ orPEP. Results: Thirty-five (94.6%) out of the 37 individuals enrolled in the study were contacts of confirmed LF cases, and friends and family members (54%) constituted the largest group. However, only 29 (83%) individuals were classified as high-risk contacts. Twenty-one (60%) of contacts were prescribed ribavirin with 6 (28.6%) of them reporting AEs. Body weakness (33%) was the most frequent AE, but there was no incidence of treatment discontinuation due to AE. Furthermore, there were no reported cases of LF among all respondents (0%), whether they had orPEP or not. Conclusion: Secondary transmission of LF seems uncommon and the benefit of orPEP is uncertain. Although AEs of ribavirin may not be uncommon, they are rarely serious enough to cause treatment interruption. More emphasis should be on supporting persons looking after LF cases adopt measures that minimize the risks of exposure.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2964    
    Printed77    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal