|Year : 2017 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 44-49
Evaluation of outcomes of tuberculosis management in private for profit and private-not-for profit directly observed treatment short course facilities in Lagos State, Nigeria
Olusola Adedeji Adejumo1, Olusoji James Daniel2, Andrew Folarin Otesanya3, Shukrat Olajumoke Salisu-Olatunj1, Husseine A Abdur-Razzaq4
1 Department of Community Health and Primary Health Care, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Alausa, Ikeja, Nigeria
2 Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care, Olabisi Onabanjo University Teaching Hospital, Sagamu, Ogun, Nigeria
3 Department of Medical Services, Central Bank of , Lagos, Nigeria
4 Department of Disease Control Lagos State TB and Leprosy Control Programme, Lagos State Ministry of Health, Alausa, Ikeja, Nigeria
|Date of Web Publication||15-Nov-2017|
Olusola Adedeji Adejumo
Department of Community Health and Primary Health Care, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: The engagement of private practitioners in the public-private mix of tuberculosis (TB) management started in 2007 in Lagos State Nigeria. This study compared the treatment outcomes of patients managed at private for profit (PFP) and private not for profit (PNFP) directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) facilities. Methods: A retrospective review of treatment cards of TB patients managed between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012, in seven PFP and four PNFP DOTS facilities that served as treatment and microscopy center under the Lagos State TB and Leprosy Control Programme (LSTBLCP) at least 2 years before data collection was conducted. Results: A total of 372 treatment cards of TB patients were reviewed, of which 132 (35.5%) and 240 (64.5%) were from PFP and PNFP DOTS facilities, respectively. Treatment success rate was higher among patients managed at PFP (89.4%) DOTS facilities than PNFP (81.3%) DOTS facilities (P = 0.04). The proportion of patients lost to follow-up (12.5% vs. 8.3%), dead (3.3% vs. 1.5%) and treatment failure (2.5% vs. 0.8%) was higher among patients managed at PNFP DOTS facilities (P > 0.05). The odds that patients treated at PFP DOTS facilities had treatment success were about four times higher than PNFP DOTS facilities when other variables have been controlled for (P < 0.05). Conclusion: There is need by the LSTBLCP to engage more private practitioners to increase case detection and improve treatment outcomes of TB patients.
Keywords: Nigeria, private directly observed treatment short course, treatment outcomes, tuberculosis
|How to cite this article:|
Adejumo OA, Daniel OJ, Otesanya AF, Salisu-Olatunj SO, Abdur-Razzaq HA. Evaluation of outcomes of tuberculosis management in private for profit and private-not-for profit directly observed treatment short course facilities in Lagos State, Nigeria. Niger Med J 2017;58:44-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Adejumo OA, Daniel OJ, Otesanya AF, Salisu-Olatunj SO, Abdur-Razzaq HA. Evaluation of outcomes of tuberculosis management in private for profit and private-not-for profit directly observed treatment short course facilities in Lagos State, Nigeria. Niger Med J [serial online] 2017 [cited 2021 Sep 17];58:44-9. Available from: https://www.nigeriamedj.com/text.asp?2017/58/1/44/218417
| Introduction|| |
The engagement of the private sector in tuberculosis (TB) control was part of the STOP TB strategy launched in 2006 by the World Health Organization (WHO) (adopted by the National TB and Leprosy Control Programme [NTBLCP]) to link all health-care providers within the private and public sector to the National Tuberculosis Programme (NTP) for the implementation of directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) activities., This was pertinent because private health practitioners provide as much as 60% of the health services in some part of the country. Also, they are preferred by many patients in some developing countries like Nigeria because they are more accessible and offered better-personalized care than the public health providers., However, the private sector have not leverage on this opportunity because they have failed to provide the rational standardized care they are positioned to deliver. Many private health providers (PHPs) in Nigeria are known to diagnose and treat TB patients inappropriately which has often led to poorer treatment outcomes., Other studies have reported that private providers rarely monitor the effects of TB treatment, maintain clinical records, or notify diseases of public health importance.,,
In Nigeria, private providers are heterogeneous and may include untrained and informally trained practitioners, private industries and corporations, not for profit faith-based organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). To provide standardized care to patients managed by the private health practitioners, increase case detection and capture TB patients managed by the private practitioners in the database of the state TB program, the STOP TB approach  was adopted and the Lagos State TB and Leprosy Control Programme (LSTBLCP) commenced engagement of private practitioners into public-private mix (PPM) for TB management in 2007. This encompasses collaboration between all forms of Public–Private (between the NTP and private sector), Public–Public (between the NTP and Public sector care provider and Private–Private (between an NGO or private hospital and a neighborhood private providers) to provide standard TB care in the country.
Studies from high burden TB countries such as India, Nepal, and Vietnam have shown that involving the private sector in DOTS management of TB was cost-effective, increased case notification, and improved treatment success comparable to the public sector.,,,, Reports from Nigeria have also shown that treatment success of patients treated by private practitioners involved in PPM and public DOTS providers were not significantly different.,, To harness this great potential of the private sector, knowledge of treatment outcomes of the various groups that constitute the PHPs involved in PPM is necessary. This will enable decision makers to make informed decision that will make the collaboration more effective. This study compared the treatment outcomes of patients managed by the private for profit (PFP) and private not for profit (PNFP) DOTS providers and also determined the predictors of treatment success of patients managed by private DOTS providers involved in the PPM mix of LSTBLCP.
| Methods|| |
A retrospective review of treatment cards of patients managed for pulmonary TB between January 1, 2012, and June 30, 2012 was conducted, to assess treatment outcomes of patients managed by PFP and PNFP DOTS providers.
The study was conducted in Lagos State located in Southwest Nigeria with an estimated population of 21 million. Health care services in Lagos State were provided by the public and private sector. There were 288 public health care facilities (3 tertiary, 35 secondary, and 253 primary health care) and 1981 registered private health-care facilities (1922 PFP and 59 PNFP) in the state in 2012.
The DOTS management of TB commenced in Lagos State in 2003 and in 2007 the PPM mix for TB management commenced. At the end of 2011, the LSTBLCP had 130 TB treatment facilities offering DOTS services. Of these, 99 were public and 31 private health-care facilities (20 PFP and 11 PNFP). Of the 8455 TB patients notified by LSTBLCP in 2012, 10% was contributed by the PFP and PNFP DOTS facilities.
After initial assessment, interested PHPs were trained as per NTBLCP guidelines and enrolled into any of the three schemes for collaboration. Under Scheme one PHP refers patients or send sputum of presumptive TB patients to an NTBLCP approved microscopy center. Under Scheme two known as “Provision of Directly Observed Treatment,” PHP served as DOTS providers to patients. While those enrolled under scheme three either served as microscopy center under NTBLCP (Microscopy Center only) or as both treatment and microscopy center. After training and signing the memoranda of understanding, recording and reporting materials, TB drugs and other consumables were given to the PHP to commence TB services. Smear microscopy, Gene Xpert and drugs were provided to TB patients managed at the PHP under the PPM mix at no cost, but they were required to pay consultation fee, and other laboratory tests such as chest X-ray and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The duration of treatment was 8 months. The treatment regimen consisted of 2 months intensive phase of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol as fixed dose combination and 6 months continuation phase of Ethambutol and Isoniazid as fixed dose combination.
HIV test was offered to all presumptive TB clients, Determine (determine HIV-1/2 Alere Determine™, Japan 2012) and Uni-Gold™ (Trinity Biotech PLC, Wicklow, Ireland 2013) were used and a concordance result was regarded as positive. However, in discordant cases, STAT-PAK ® was used as tie-breaker.
Coordination of tuberculosis control program
TB control in the state is coordinated by the LSTBLCP. Each DOTS facility has TB focal person responsible for the day to day running of the facility and ensures that patient's records are intact. Records of patients in DOTS facility within a local government area (LGA) was collated and sent to the state TB program by the LGA TB supervisors' quarterly.
Population and sample
From a sampling frame of 31 private DOTS facilities provided by the Lagos State TB program officer, all (11) the DOTS facilities that served as both microscopy and treatment centers and had been involved in DOTS program under the LSTBLCP for at least 2 years before data collection were recruited into the study. Treatment cards of patients enrolled and treated for TB within the first two quarters of 2012 in the selected facilities were reviewed. Socio demographic and other relevant details including the treatment outcomes were assessed. Treatment cards with wrong or incomplete data were not analyzed.
Evaluation of treatment outcome
The treatment outcome was divided into five categories according to the WHO and NTBLCP guidelines.
- Cured was defined as the proportion of patients among smear positive patients that completed treatment and had at least two negative smears with an interval of at least 1 month, one of which should be obtained at the end of treatment
- Treatment completed were the proportion of patients that completed treatment, but sputum examination results were not available at the end of treatment
- Treatment failure was the proportion of patients who remained sputum smear positive at 5 months or more after the start of anti-TB drugs, or who interrupted treatment for more than 2 months after completing 1 month of chemotherapy, returned to treatment and were found to be smear positive
- Defaulter was the proportion of patients that did not take drugs for two consecutive months or more. Transferred out was the proportion recorded that moved out of the health facility catchment area
- Treatment success was defined as the sum of the cases that were cured and that completed treatment.
Data were entered and analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Sciences (version 19; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Percentages, mean and standard deviation of numerical data were calculated. Chi-square was used to compare categorical data. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of treatment success. All (independent) variables that were significant (P< 0.05) on bivariate analysis were entered at once (enter method) into the regression model as predictor variables at the beginning to assess their predictive ability while controlling for the effect of other variables in the model. Confidence interval was set at 95% for all statistical tests, and statistical tests were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05. Microsoft Excel was used to draw charts.
Permission to collect data from the private DOTS facilities was gotten from the Lagos State Ministry of Health.
| Results|| |
Three hundred and seventy-two treatment cards of TB' patients were reviewed out of which 132 (35.5%) and 240 (64.5%) were from the PFP and PNFP DOTS facilities, respectively [Figure 1]. The mean age of patients managed at the PFP and PNFP was respectively 34.1 ± 13.6 and 31.1 ± 11.6 (P< 0.025). A higher proportion of males (55% vs. 42.4%), new cases (92.5% vs. 78.8%), smear positive (82.5% vs. 62.1%), and TB/HIV co-infected patients (12.5% vs. 3.0%) were managed for TB at the PNFP compared with the PFP DOTS facilities (P< 0.05) [Table 1].
|Figure 1: Proportion of tuberculosis patients managed at the PFP and PNFP directly observed treatment short course facilities. PFP – Private for profit; PNFP – Private not for profit|
Click here to view
|Table 1: Sociodemographic characteristics of tuberculosis patients at the private for profit and private not for profit directly observed treatment short course facilities|
Click here to view
Treatment success, default and death rate of patients managed at the private DOTS facilities was respectively 84.1%, 11%, and 2.7% [Table 2]. However, the treatment success rate was significantly higher among TB patients managed at the PFP (89.4%) DOTS facilities compared with those managed at the PNFP (81.3%) DOTS facilities (P = 0.04). The proportion of patients lost to follow-up (12.5% vs. 8.3%), dead (3.3% vs. 1.5%), and those with treatment failure (2.5% vs. 0.8%) was higher among TB patients managed at the PNFP DOTS facilities (P > 0.05) [Table 2].
|Table 2: Treatment outcomes at the different directly observed treatment short course facilities|
Click here to view
The age, smear status, and type of private DOTS facility where TB patients were managed were associated with treatment success. A significantly higher proportion of patients aged 30 years and above (88.9% vs. 79.1%), managed at the PFP DOTS facilities (89.4% vs. 81.3%), and smear-negative patients (94% vs. 80.7%) had treatment success compared with patients below 30 years of age, managed at PNFF DOTS facilities and smear-positive patients (P< 0.05) [Table 3]. Patients managed at the PFP DOTS facilities had about four-fold chance (odds ratio 3.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.430–9.750) of having treatment success than those managed at the PNFP DOTS facilities [Table 4].
|Table 3: Factors associated with treatment success in private directly observed treatment short course facilities|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Predictors of treatment success at private directly observed treatment short course facilities|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
TB is still a major public health issue in Nigeria and predisposing factors such as poor hygiene, housing, nutrition, and poverty influences treatment outcome. The treatment success of patients managed at the private DOTS provider in this study was 84.1% which was similar to what was reported in studies from Nigeria among private DOTS providers,,, but lower than 90.9% reported from Ethiopia. The higher national treatment success rate for Ethiopia (89%) compared with Nigeria (86%) may be responsible for this finding.
In this study, treatment success was higher among patients managed at PFP DOTS facilities and their odds of having treatment success was about four fold higher than patients managed at PNFP DOTS facilities. A study from Nigeria showed that in places services were provided free-of-charge, the total cost of TB care per household was very high (about 37% of median annual household income). The extra cost of consultation fees and other laboratory tests charged by private DOTS providers may make the cost of services higher than expected especially at the profit driven PFP DOTS facilities. Patients managed at PFP DOTS facilities were probably richer, had better education, nutrition, and knowledge of TB than patients managed at PNFP DOT facilities consequently leading to better treatment outcomes.
In this study, the default, death, and treatment failure rate was higher among patients managed at the PNFP DOTS facilities compared with PFP DOTS facilities. This finding may be because of the difference in the socioeconomic status of patients managed at PFP and PNFP DOTS facilities. In addition, patients that could not afford the fees charged by PFP DOTS providers were probably referred to PNFP DOTS providers for management. Studies from Nigeria and elsewhere have shown that poverty and lack of education were associated with default.,,, Another study from Nigeria showed that default from treatment was associated with the death.
Smear status of TB patients was associated with treatment success at private DOTS facilities similar to findings from study from Nigeria which reported that positive sputum smears was associated with treatment failure  Smear negative pulmonary TB patient are known to have the lower bacillary burden and minimal pulmonary lesion which would imply that they probably responded to chemotherapy better than smear positive TB patients.
| Conclusion|| |
The proportion of patients with treatment success at PFP DOTS facilities was higher than PNFP DOTS facilities. There is a need for the LSTBLCP to engage more private practitioners to increase case detection and provide rational standardize treatment to TB patients in Lagos State.
The authors wish to acknowledge all the Lagos State TB control officer, TB focal persons, LGA TB supervisors and the Lagos State Ministry of Health for their support.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
World Health Organization. STOP TB Partnership: DOTS Expansion Working Group Strategic Plan 2006-2015. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. The global and regional burden of disease and risk factors: Systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006;367:1747-57.
Federal Ministry of Health. Public-Private Mix in Tuberculosis Control: Implementation Guidelines. Abuja, Nigeria: FMOH; 2004.
World Health Organization. World Health Organization: DOTS. Geneva: WHO; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/dots/en/
. [Last accessed on 2016 Feb 16].
Lei X, Liu Q, Escobar E, Philogene J, Zhu H, Wang Y, et al.
Public-private mix for tuberculosis care and control: A systematic review. Int J Infect Dis 2015;34:20-32.
World Health Organization. Involving Private Medical Practitioners in TB and STI Control. Report of an Informal Consultation Bangkok. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
Dosumu EA. Survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding tuberculosis among general and private medical practitioners in Nigeria. Afr J Respir Med 2008:17-9.
Okeke TA, Aguwa EN. Evaluation of the implementation of directly observed treatment short course by private medical practitioners in the management of tuberculosis in Enugu, Nigeria. Tanzan Health Res Bull 2006;8:86-9.
Mills A, Brugha R, Hanson K, McPake B. What can be done about the private health sector in low-income countries? Bull World Health Organ 2002;80:325-30.
Uplekar M, Pathania V, Raviglione M. Private practitioners and public health: Weak links in tuberculosis control. Lancet 2001;358:912-6.
Sheikh K, Porter J, Kielmann K, Rangan S. Public-private partnerships for equity of access to care for tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS: Lessons from Pune, India. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2006;100:312-20.
Raviglione MC, Uplekar MW. WHO's new STOP TB strategy. Lancet 2006;367:952-5.
Floyd K, Arora VK, Murthy KJ, Lonnroth K, Singla N, Akbar Y, et al.
Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control: Evidence from India. Bull World Health Organ 2006;84:437-45.
Karki DK, Mirzoev TN, Green AT, Newell JN, Baral SC. Costs of a successful public-private partnership for TB control in an urban setting in Nepal. BMC Public Health 2007;7:84.
Quy HT, Lan NT, Lönnroth K, Buu TN, Dieu TT, Hai LT. Public-private mix for improved TB control in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam: An assessment of its impact on case detection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003;7:464-71.
Dewan PK, Lal SS, Lonnroth K, Wares F, Uplekar M, Sahu S, et al.
Improving tuberculosis control through public-private collaboration in India: Literature review. BMJ 2006;332:574-8.
Obermeyer Z, Abbott-Klafter J, Murray CJ. Has the DOTS strategy improved case finding or treatment success? An empirical assessment. PLoS One 2008;3:e1721.
Gidado M, Ejembi CL. Tuberculosis case management and treatment outcome: Assessment of the effectiveness of Public-Private Mix of tuberculosis programme in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2009;8:25-31.
] [Full text]
Adejumo AO, Daniel OJ, Adejumo EN, Oluwole EO, Olumuyiwa OO. Treatment outcomes of tuberculosis patients managed at the public and private DOTS facilities in Lagos, Nigeria. IJTDH 2015;10:1-9.
Efegbere HA, Anyabolu AE, Adogu PO, Efegbere EK, Enemuo EH, Okonkwo RC, et al
. Effectiveness of treatment outcomes of public private mix tuberculosis control program in Eastern Nigeria. J Biol Agric Healthc 2014;4:16-22.
Federal Ministry of Health. National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Control Program. Models for the Training of General Health Care Workers on Tuberculosis Control. 4th
ed. Abuja: Sound Prints; 2012. p. 8-51.
Ibrahim LM, Oleribe OO, Nguku P, Tongwong GC, Mato LG, Longkyer MI, et al.
Evaluation of quality of TB control services by private health care providers in Plateau state, Nigeria; 2012. Pan Afr Med J 2014;17:77.
Gebrekidan G, Tesfaye G, Hambisa MT, Deyessa N. Quality of tuberculosis care in private health facilities of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Tuberc Res Treat 2014;2014:720432.
Ukwaja KN, Alobu I, Lgwenyi C, Hopewell PC. The high cost of free tuberculosis services: Patient and household costs associated with tuberculosis care in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. PLoS One 2013;8:e73134.
Ibrahim LM, Hadejia IS, Nguku P, Dankoli R, Waziri NE, Akhimien MO, et al.
Factors associated with interruption of treatment among Pulmonary Tuberculosis patients in Plateau State, Nigeria 2011. Pan Afr Med J 2014;17:78.
Anyaike C, Musa OI, Babatunde OA, Bolarinwa OA, Durowade KA, Ajayi OS. Adherence to tuberculosis therapy in Unilorin teaching hospital, Ilorin, north-central Nigeria. Int J Sci Environ Technol 2013;2:1441-61.
Anaam MS, Ibrahim M, Izham M, Serouri A, Wahed A, Aldobhani A. Factors affecting patients' compliance to anti-tuberculosis treatment in Yemen. J Pharm Health Serv Res 2013;4(2):115-22.
Sengul A, Akturk UA, Aydemir Y, Kaya N, Kocak ND, Tasolar FT. Factors affecting successful treatment outcomes in pulmonary tuberculosis: A single-center experience in Turkey, 2005-2011. J Infect Dev Ctries 2015;9:821-8.
Amoran OE. Rates and risk factors for mortality among tuberculosis patients on directly observed therapy in rural primary health care centres in Ogun State, Nigeria. Niger Med Pract 2013;63:74-82.
Alobu I, Oshi DC, Oshi SN, Ukwaja KN. Profile and determinants of treatment failure among smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Ebonyi, Southeastern Nigeria. Int J Mycobacteriol 2014;3:127-31. [Full text]
Colebunders R, Bastian I. A review of the diagnosis and treatment of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2000;4:97-107.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|This article has been cited by|
||Nursing actions promoting adherence to tuberculosis treatment: scoping review
| ||Priscila Tadei Nakata Zago,Rosana Maffacciolli,Fernanda Carlise Mattioni,Carlise Rigon Dalla-Nora,Cristianne Maria Famer Rocha |
| ||Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2021; 55 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||“Treatment adherence status of the TB patients notified from private sector and its associated factors: Findings of a secondary data analysis from West Bengal, India.”
| ||Abhijit Dey,Arista Lahiri,Sweety Suman Jha,Vivek Sharma,Parthiban Shanmugam,Arup Kumar Chakrabartty |
| ||Indian Journal of Tuberculosis. 2021; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Magnitude of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Its Resistance to Rifampicin Using Xpert-MTB/RIF Assay Among Presumptive Tuberculosis Patients at Motta General Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia
| ||Tesfaye Andualem Demissie,Dereje Belayneh |
| ||Infection and Drug Resistance. 2021; Volume 14: 1335 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Treatment outcomes of drug susceptible Tuberculosis in private health facilities in Lagos, South-West Nigeria
| ||Olanrewaju Oladimeji,Victor Adepoju,Felix Emeka Anyiam,James Emmanuel San,Babatunde A. Odugbemi,Francis Leonard Mpotte Hyera,Maureen Nokuthula Sibiya,Sanni Yaya,Ayuba Ibrahim Zoakah,Lovett Lawson,Claudia Marotta |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(1): e0244581 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Governance of tuberculosis control programme in Nigeria
| ||Daniel Chukwuemeka Ogbuabor,Obinna Emmanuel Onwujekwe |
| ||Infectious Diseases of Poverty. 2019; 8(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Factors associated with hospitalization and death among TB/HIV co-infected persons in Porto Alegre, Brazil
| ||Maíra Rossetto,Évelin Maria Brand,Renata Mendonça Rodrigues,Laura Serrant,Luciana Barcellos Teixeira,Sarah L. Pett |
| ||PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(1): e0209174 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment success rate among adult patients with tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa
| ||Jonathan Izudi,Daniel Semakula,Richard Sennono,Imelda K Tamwesigire,Francis Bajunirwe |
| ||BMJ Open. 2018; 8(12): e024559 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|