|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 117-121
Knowledge and parity: Perspectives of usage of emergency contraceptive pills among women of a rural area of Delhi
Monalisha Sahu, Pragti Chhabra, Vaishali Gautam
Department of Community Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
|Date of Web Publication||21-Aug-2019|
C/o Dr. A B Sahu, Professor's Colony, Samlong, Namkum, Ranchi - 834 010, Jharkhand
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Context: Correct use of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) may prevent up to 95% of unwanted pregnancies which may significantly decrease unsafe abortions and maternal mortality. Aims: Assessment of knowledge and use of ECPs among women and to explore factors associated with them. Materials and Methods: This was a facility-based cross-sectional study. Data were collected using a prestructured, pretested questionnaire from 381 reproductive age women (15–49 years) selected by systematic random sampling. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 16 and Epi info (version 7.0.) were used for all statistical analyses. Descriptive analysis was performed, and results were expressed in terms of frequencies and percentages. The Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used as tests of significance in univariate analysis. Determinants of use of ECPs were identified using logistic regression. Results: Of 381 women interviewed, awareness level of ECPs (ever heard about ECPs) was found to be 34% (n = 128). Ever use of emergency contraception was reported by 38 (9.7%). Age (odds ratio [OR] = 3.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.88–4.87]), education (OR = 0.086, 95% CI [0.047–0.158]), husband's education (OR = 0.11, 95% CI [0.067–0.187]), socioeconomic status (OR = 6.14, 95% CI [3.28–11.51]), and family status (OR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.59–4.24]) were found to be significantly associated with the use of emergency contraceptives. Conclusions: The study identified that most respondents lack adequate knowledge about ECPs, and ever use of ECPs was very low. Factors that were associated with the use of ECPs were age, literacy, socioeconomic status, and knowledge about the method. Creating a sustainable awareness on ECPs and their use may serve them with power to control their parity.
Keywords: Availability, determinants, emergency contraceptive pills, unwanted pregnancy
|How to cite this article:|
Sahu M, Chhabra P, Gautam V. Knowledge and parity: Perspectives of usage of emergency contraceptive pills among women of a rural area of Delhi. Niger Med J 2019;60:117-21
|How to cite this URL:|
Sahu M, Chhabra P, Gautam V. Knowledge and parity: Perspectives of usage of emergency contraceptive pills among women of a rural area of Delhi. Niger Med J [serial online] 2019 [cited 2021 May 15];60:117-21. Available from: https://www.nigeriamedj.com/text.asp?2019/60/3/117/264953
| Introduction|| |
Unintended pregnancy is an important public health issue in various developed and developing countries because of its association with health, social, and economic consequences., Reducing the number of unintended pregnancies alone can avert 60% of maternal deaths and 57% of the child deaths. The WHO reports that of the 111,301 nonpregnant women who did not desire pregnancy; India contributes the largest number at 17.1%. Statistics for unintended pregnancy (both unwanted and mistimed) have been almost stagnant over the years in India with all three rounds of the National Family Health Surveys reporting almost the same results that about one-fourth of the pregnant women had unintended pregnancies.,, It can be blamed on low awareness as well as stronger gender-based power imbalances due to which women are unable to exercise sexual and reproductive decision-making.
Expanding the number of modern family planning options available to women is a critical part of decreasing unintended pregnancies globally. Emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) are a safe, effective, and female-controlled method of postcoital contraception. They provide women an important option to control their fertility even in the male-dominated society. ECPs are available as combined estrogen and progestin pills, progestin-only (levonorgestrel) pills and antiprogestin (ulipristal acetate or mifepristone) pills were made legal in India way back in 2003, and the Department of Health and Family Welfare had introduced them as E-pills in the National Family Welfare Programme during the same time with efforts to utilize them at all levels of the public health system. It was made available over-the-counter and included in the accredited social health activist kits to make it widely available at the community level.
Till date, the interventions designed to increase access to ECPs have not led to decreased pregnancy rates at the population level. In order to achieve the public health benefits of widespread ECPs availability, potential users must be well informed about it. Specifically, women must know that ECPs exists, how safe and effective ECPs is as a contraceptive, what can be the possible side effects of using ECPs, what are the time limits within which it should be used to be effective, how and where it can be obtained? Without this knowledge, women will miss the opportunity to access and utilize ECPs. Till date, there are almost nil data available on exploration of knowledge and the usage of ECPs in rural women in India. Therefore, this study was needed to explore the perspective of the usage of ECPs and the important factors associated with it, so that it can help determine the best approaches to serve as a backup to other family planning methods to avoid unintended pregnancies and unsafe abortions.
This article aims to explore the knowledge and perspectives regarding the usage of ECPs in the rural reproductive age women with the following objectives:
- To assess the knowledge and usage of ECPs among reproductive age group women of rural Northwest Delhi
- To study the major factors associated with ECPs utilization among them.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The cross-sectional study was carried out from March to July 2015 in one of the health centers attached to a Medical College and Teaching Hospital of Delhi which provides regular reproductive health services to the rural areas of Northwest Delhi. Literacy rate of the area was 76.05%, which is lower than the state average of 86.21%. Women of reproductive age group (15–49 years) both patients and attendants were included in the study. The sample size was calculated based on the data from a previous study done by Pandey et al. in Delhi in low-socioeconomic group women who reported knowledge of emergency contraception (EC) of 38.3%, using Epi-Info software Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia (United States) 95% confidence interval (CI) and 5% margin of error. The minimal sample size calculated was 363. On an average, 600 women attend the outreach center every month. Systematic sampling was used, and every third woman visiting health center was asked to participate in the study. Women were eligible if they were between the ages of 15 and 49 and ever had sexual intercourse. Women were approached to participate regardless of their reason for being at the clinic (refusals <3%). Three hundred and eighty-one women were included in the final analysis. Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Complete confidentiality regarding patient information was maintained through all the stages of the study. We followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines thoroughly.
A predesigned, pretested, and semi-structured interview schedule was used which had both open- and closed-ended questions under following parts: (a) questions to assess sociodemographic profile of the subject; (b) questions about the menstrual and obstetric history of the women; (c) questions to assess the knowledge regarding ECs; and (d) questions to know the history of usage of ECs in the past. Knowledge about ECPs was assessed using questions of awareness about the types, the time limit for use after unprotected sex, and the dosage. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 International Business Machines Corporation, Chicago (United States) and Epi info (version 7.0.) were used for all statistical analyses. Descriptive analysis was performed and results were expressed in terms of frequencies and percentages. The Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used as tests of significance in univariate analysis. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results|| |
The sociodemographic characteristics of the women are presented in [Table 1]. More than one-third of the patients (38%, n = 145) were in the age group of 21–30 years, 82.2% (n = 313) of them had less than primary education, and 58% (n = 221) belonged to middle socioeconomic status as per Prasad's Classification. Of all, 56.4% (n = 215) of participants reported that they had completed their family and did not want any more children. An ideal number of children reported by the majority (86.3%, n = 329) was two. Twenty-three percent of participants had three or more children. Almost 14% (n = 52) of participants reported undergoing voluntary termination of pregnancy at least once in their life as the pregnancy was unintended. Only 17% (n = 63) of participants were protected from impending pregnancy last time they had sexual intercourse, either by practicing any modern method of contraception or by terminal methods.
Of the 381 sexually active women who participated in the study, only 2.8% (n = 11) had come to the facility for family planning services specifically. Most of the participants were attending the clinic for their own medical problems (63.1%, n = 241) or accompanying their child/other relative for medical care or immunization or antenatal care services (34.1%, n = 129).
Knowledge and usage of emergency contraceptive pills
Details about women's knowledge and usage of ECPs are presented in [Table 2]. Overall, 34% (n = 128) of women had ever heard of ECPs when asked directly. Eleven percent (n = 42) of women spontaneously mentioned ECPs by name or description when asked if there was anything a woman could do soon after unprotected sexual intercourse (UPSI) to try to prevent pregnancy. Respondents who were aware of ECPs most commonly (73%, n = 94) reported that they had first heard about ECPs from partners, friends, or family members. Other sources of information about ECPs in women were the mass media (19%, n = 24) and clinics/health staff (6%, n = 8). Of those who were aware of ECPs, approximately 24% (n = 31) of participants said that they did not know what is the correct time interval for the use of EC after UPSI and 67.2% (n = 86) of the participants did not know the appropriate interval between UPSI and taking ECPs. Based on recent evidence, we considered this interval to be up to 72 h after sexual intercourse. Most of the women (63%, n = 81) thought that it can be only obtained from a pharmacy or drugstore, whereas only 7.1% (n = 9) knew that it can be obtained from a health-care worker. More than one-third of women (37%, n = 47) believed that it should not be taken without prescription. The majority (58.6%, n = 75) was in the view that the most common side effect due to ECPs is irregular menses, followed by heavy menstrual bleeding (53.9%, n = 69). Substantial percentage of women (30.5%, n = 39) were unaware about the recommended dosing of ECPs, whereas 26% (n = 33) were unaware of the appropriate gap between the doses.
|Table 2: Knowledge about emergency contraception among the study participants who never heard of emergency contraception (n=128)|
Click here to view
Seventy-nine percent of women (n = 102) who were aware of ECPs, had used it; 73% (n = 65) of them had used it more than once. The main sources of the acquisition were from pharmacies (91%, n = 81). Sixty-seven percent of the women had used it within 48 h of UPSI.
Factors associated with the use of emergency contraceptive pills
Univariate logistic analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with the use of ECPs and presented in [Table 3]. Age of respondents was found significantly associated with the use of ECPs (odds ratio [OR] = 11.4, 95% CI [6.32, 20.9]). The likelihood of using EC increased as the education level of the study participants (OR = 11.4, 95% CI [6.32, 20.9]) as well as their husband increased (OR = 8.89, 95% CI [5.33, 14.86]). Similarly, women who belonged to lower socioeconomic status were less likely to use ECPs compared to those belonging to middle or higher (OR = 6.14, 95% CI [3.28–11.51]). Furthermore, couples were more likely to use ECPs when the family was complete (OR = 2.6, 95% CI [1.59–4.24]). Ideal numbers of children or previous abortions were not significantly associated with the usage of ECPs.
|Table 3: Association of characteristics of the women with the use of emergency contraceptive pills post unprotected sexual intercourse|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
The awareness level of ECPs among the reproductive age women in this study was found to be 34.1%. Similar findings were observed in another study in women belonging to the low-socioeconomic group in a municipal corporation hospital of an urban area of Delhi. However, in some previous studies in North India, rural Uttar Pradesh, and Chandigarh, the awareness level was found to be as low as 0%, 2%, and 1%, respectively.,, Whereas, in another study from Raipur, 56% of women were aware of ECPs and 19.3% had actually used it. The higher awareness in this study may be attributed to the fact that it was conducted in the medical termination of pregnancy ([MTP] clinic) and all the respondents came to the clinic either for MTP or for availing family planning services. Globally, awareness about ECPs in our study was lower than that from European nations but was higher than or similar to what has been reported in developing countries such as Kenya and Nigeria.,,
In this study, majority of women (73%, n = 94) got the information about ECPs from their partners, friends, or family members which was in contrast to other studies from Bangalore and Mumbai, where majority of respondents (66.4% and 80%, respectively) gained the information from radio/television and other sources like health workers., Our findings were in agreement with the results from other developing countries such as Nigeria and Ethiopia, where a good proportion of women (54% and 38%, respectively) said that they came to know about ECPs through family or friends.,
In this study, 32.8% of the respondents had correct knowledge about timing for using ECPs which was similar (39.7%) to the study conducted in Mumbai, whereas in the studies from Nigeria and Karachi, only 6.5% and 2% of respondents, respectively, were aware of it.,,
In this study, 58.6% of women aware of ECPs feared menstrual irregularities as major adverse effect followed heavy bleeding (53.9%) and nausea and vomiting (36%). In another study from Bangalore, 74.44% of respondents reported nausea, vomiting, and pain abdomen as the major adverse effect, and only 12% complained of menstrual irregularities as the chief adverse effect.
Another important finding of this study was that about 79% of women (n = 102) who were aware of EC had used it; 73% (n = 65) of them had used it more than once. This was remarkably higher than the 0.06% and 14.1% of the respondents, respectively, in studies from Mumbai and Bangalore., The difference may be accounted for the better availability in our study participants.
The UK, National statistics revealed only 7% of the female ever used ECPs in last year. This can be explained by the fact that may be due to better awareness, they are using ECPs as only back up method of contraception relying more on regular methods of contraceptions.
| Conclusions|| |
Our findings suggest that there is considerable lack of knowledge about ECPs in reproductive age group women of this part of country. Most of the respondents had never heard of ECPs, and those who heard about it lacked adequate knowledge about ECP indications, usage, side effects and availability. Ever use of ECPs was also very low. Age, education, socioeconomic status, and attainment of required family size were major factors influencing usage of the ECPs. Awareness and knowledge about the ECPs promoted their use by women in the need of hour. The family welfare program should prioritize efforts to create sustainable awareness and availability on basket of choices available for contraception including ECPs. This shall certainly empower women to control their parity and hence essentially their lives.
We are grateful to Dr. Urveshi and Dr. Neha for the help provided by them during data collection. Furthermore, we are immensely thankful to the study participants for their valuable time and cooperation.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: Worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010;41:241-50.
Klima CS. Unintended pregnancy. Consequences and solutions for a worldwide problem. J Nurse Midwifery 1998;43:483-91.
Stenberg K, Axelson H, Sheehan P, Anderson I, Gülmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, et al.
Advancing social and economic development by investing in women's and children's health: A new global investment framework. Lancet 2014;383:1333-54.
International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005-06. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International; 2009. Available from: http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs/nfhs3.shtml
. [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 12].
International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) 1998-99. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International; 2009. Available from: http://www.rchiips.org/nfhs/nfhs2.shtml
. [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 12].
International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey (MCH and Family Planning), 1992-93. Bombay: International Institute for Population Sciences; 1995. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/SR162/SR162.pdf
. [Last accessed on 2019 Jul 12].
Hutchinson MK, Jemmott JB 3rd
, Jemmott LS, Braverman P, Fong GT. The role of mother-daughter sexual risk communication in reducing sexual risk behaviors among urban adolescent females: A prospective study. J Adolesc Health 2003;33:98-107.
Bongaarts J, Johansson E. Future trends in contraceptive prevalence and method mix in the developing world. Stud Fam Plann 2002;33:24-36.
Leung VW, Levine M, Soon JA. Mechanisms of action of hormonal emergency contraceptives. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:158-68.
Pandey D, Garg D, Salhan S. Study of knowledge and contraception practices in low socio-economic women of Delhi. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2014;3:1022-6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20141229
[Last accessed on 2019 Jul 12].
Tripathi R, Rathore AM, Sachdeva J. Emergency contraception: Knowledge, attitude, and practices among health care providers in North India. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2003;29:142-6.
Nigam A, Maheshwari N, Prakash A. Knowledge of emergency contraception and contraceptive practices: Representative study from rural Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Community Med 2010;35:449-50.
] [Full text]
Reeti M, Poonam G, Deepti D, Anju H, Mehra R. Knowledge of emergency contraception among women coming for induced abortion. J Obs Gynecol India [Internet]. 2006;56:233-5. Available from: http://medind.nic.in/jaq/t06/i3/jaqt06i3p233.pdf
. [Last cited 2019 Jun 18].
Singh V, Thakur P, Nayak K, Agrawal S. Knowledge attitude and practice (KAP) of emergency contraceptive pills among women of reproductive age group attending AIIMS OPD Raipur. Int J Adv Med [Internet]. 2014;1:105-12. Available from: http://www.ijmedicine.com
. [Last cited 2019 Jun 18].
Ellertson C, Shochet T, Blanchard K, Trussell J. Emergency contraception: A review of the programmatic and social science literature. Contraception 2000;61:145-86.
Ellertson C, Winikoff B, Armstrong E, Camp S, Senanayake P. Expanding access to emergency contraception in developing countries. Stud Fam Plann 1995;26:251-63.
Muia E, Ellertson C, Lukhando M, Flul B, Clark S, Olenja J. Emergency contraception in Nairobi, Kenya: Knowledge, attitudes and practices among policymakers, family planning providers and clients, and university students. Contraception 1999;60:223-32.
Lakshmidevi M, Venkatesh S, Saxena R, Pandey P. Knowledge, Experience And Opinion on Emergency Contraception Among Urban Educated Women. J Evol Med Dent Sci [Internet]. 2014;3:9039-45. Available from: http://www.jemds.com/data_pdf/lakshmidevi m.pdf
. [Last cited 2019 Jun 18].
Khargekar N, Shingade P, Khargekar V, Pagar V. Knowledge About Emergency Contraceptive Pills Versus Conventional Contraceptive Methods Among Married Females Attending Shivaji Nagar Urban Health Centre, Govandi, Mumbai. Indian J Res [Internet]. 2015;4:287-9. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/UnintendedPregnancy/index.htm
. [Last cited 2019 Jun 18].
Aziken ME, Okonta PI, Ande AB. Knowledge and perception of emergency contraception among female Nigerian undergraduates. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2003;29:84-7.
Tajure N, Pharm B. Knowledge, attitude and practice of emergency contraception among graduating female students of Jimma UniSSversity, Southwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci 2010;20:91-7.
Gupta RK, Raina SK, Verma AK, Shora T. Emergency contraception: Knowledge and attitude toward its use among medical students of a medical college in North-West India. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2016;8:235-9.
Rocca CH, Shankar M, Sreevathsa A, Krishnan S. Acceptability and use of emergency contraception among married women in Bangalore, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013;121:64-8.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]