|
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2020 | Volume
: 61
| Issue : 3 | Page : 114-119 |
|
|
Determinants of psychosocial health-related quality of life of adults with sickle cell disease in a Nigerian setting
Theresa Nwagha1, Babatunde Ishola Omotowo2
1 Department of Haematology and Immunology UNTH/Departmant of Haematoogy, AEFUTHA, College of Medicine, Enugu Campus, Enugu State, Nigeria
2 Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, Enugu Campus, Enugu State, Nigeria
| Date of Submission | 02-Aug-2019 |
| Date of Decision | 04-Dec-2019 |
| Date of Acceptance | 25-Mar-2020 |
| Date of Web Publication | 04-Jul-2020 |
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Babatunde Ishola Omotowo
Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu State
Nigeria
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/nmj.NMJ_122_19
 Abstract | | |
Background: With improved understanding of disease mechanism in sickle cell disorder, many persons living with sickle cell disease (SCD) are surviving unto adulthood. There is a growing concern that SCD may impair the psychosocial health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with a resultant lack of psychosocial stability and integration. The objective of this study was to assess the determinants of psychosocial quality of life (QoL) among adults with SCD. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of adults with SCD. A multidimensional self-administered instrument, prevalidated for use in adults with chronic disease, was used. It consisted of 31 items that assessed physical function, physical and emotional role function, bodily pain, vitality, social function, mental health, and general health within 2 weeks prior to the time of survey. Questionnaires were administered to adults with sickle cell anemia who presented for their routine visit to the Sickle Cell Clinic at the Hematology Clinic in University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla Enugu, or during sickle cell support group meetings. Psychosocial HRQoL was the primary outcome measured. Sociodemographic features such as marital status, gender, educational qualification, and SCD were the primary independent variables of interest. Results: A total of I16 adults with SCD were participated in the study. After adjusting for marital status, gender, and educational qualification of adults with SCD, gender and marital status did not significantly affect psychosocial HRQoL (P = 0.619 and P = 0.146), respectively, while educational status significantly affected their HRQoL (P = 0.013). Conclusions: Adults with SCD have impaired psychosocial HRQoL. There is a need to upscale patient-focused interventions to improve self-esteem and overall QoL.
Keywords: Determinants, Nigeria, psychosocial quality of life, sickle cell disease
How to cite this article:
Nwagha T, Omotowo BI. Determinants of psychosocial health-related quality of life of adults with sickle cell disease in a Nigerian setting. Niger Med J 2020;61:114-9 |
How to cite this URL:
Nwagha T, Omotowo BI. Determinants of psychosocial health-related quality of life of adults with sickle cell disease in a Nigerian setting. Niger Med J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2023 Dec 9];61:114-9. Available from: https://www.nigeriamedj.com/text.asp?2020/61/3/114/288921 |
| Introduction | |  |
Sickle cell diseases (SCDs) are characterized by chronic painful episodes, multiple systemic involvement with increased morbidity and mortality rates. With improved health systems, childhood survivals, and absence of a cure, the aging SCD population is facing multifaceted effects from acute-on-chronic vascular, inflammatory, and thrombotic injury. Life expectancy for adults with sickle cell anemia remains stubbornly stagnant in the fifth decade of life.[1] Adults with SCD encounter significant disease-related complications which may include stroke, pulmonary hypertension, nephropathy, congestive heart failure, sickle leg ulcers, and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral or humeral heads.[2]
Quality of life (QoL) is a broad multidimensional concept that usually includes subjective evaluations of both positive and negative aspects of life.[3] Health, emotional well-being, social dysfunction, chronic pain, and fatigability form the domains of overall complex QoL.[4] The severity of the disease is, in general, inversely proportional to the QoL.[5] Health-related QoL (HRQoL) refers to the physical, psychological, and social domains of health seen in areas influenced by a person's experiences, beliefs, expectations, and perceptions.[6],[7] The closer a person's life is to the standard of normalcy, the better the HRQoL.[8] There are numerous reports of the impact of SCD on the psychosocial health, with a resultant lack of psychological stability and social integration.[8],[9]
Studies in both children and adolescents with SCD have reported poor HRQoL in qualitative studies using focus groups[10],[11] and comparatively fare worse in their HRQoL than those of controls on health surveys.[12] Despite the considerable evidence in children for reduced HRQoL in SCD, there are few reports from evaluation of the impact of this disease on HRQoL in adults.[10],[13]
The impact of this disease on psychosocial HRQoL for adults may be even greater than for children. Reports from a recent study showed depression and anxiety accounted for more of the variance in all domains of QoL than hemoglobin (Hb) type.[14] A similar study also reported that underlying stress and coping mechanism accounted for 44%–50% of dissimilarity in psychological adjustment to the disease.[15] HRQoL, in general, can be further worsened by poor socioeconomic conditions, lack of social support, episodic, debilitating pain associated with substantial analgesic use, frequent hospitalization for pain episodes, and ultimately organ failure.[16],[17]
Despite the fact that SCD has been largely studied in terms of population frequency clinical variations and pathogenetic mechanisms,[17],[18],[19],[20] research that addresses aspects related to HRQoL of persons living with SCD are relatively few in both the Nigerian and international literature. In this study, an in-depth assessment of the determinants of the psychosocial HRQoL among adult SCD population in Nigeria was undertaken to gain an understanding of factors that modify psychosocial impact of the disease. It may also provide health-care practitioners who care for these patients a more objective perspective on the impact and severity of this disease.
| Materials and Methods | | |
Study area
This study was conducted between March and December 2017 among 116 patients in the Outpatient Sickle Cell Clinic of University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu. UNTH is a tertiary health facility, and patients are referred from many states in Nigeria to the facility.
Study design and patients selection
This was a cross-sectional study of 116 adults with SCD. These cohort of patients were either approached by their hematologist during consultation in the Hematology Outpatient Sickle Cell Clinic of UNTH or during their sickle cell support group meetings. A total of 116 patients above 18 years were selected consecutively.
Diagnosis of sickle cell disease
The diagnosis of SCD was made by both clinical and laboratory.
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of SCD
- Age ≥18 years at the time of the interview
- No cognitive disturbances.
Exclusion criteria
- Age <18 years
- Patients with cognitive disturbances.
Measures
The WHO QoL 100 modified multidimensional self-administered instrument, prevalidated for use in adults with chronic disease, was used. It consisted of 31 items representing eight of the most important dimensions of HRQoL: physical function, physical role functions, emotional role functioning, bodily pain, vitality, general health, mental health, and social function, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.82. Psychosocial variables and QoL were the primary outcome measured. Sociodemographic features such as marital status, gender, educational qualification, and type of SCD were the primary dependent variables of interest.
Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical variables
Sociodemographic and clinical information was obtained from the patients and records regarding sex, education, age, marital status, age at the first diagnosis, type of SCD, presence of complications, frequency of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC), and history of blood transfusion.
Outcome variables
Quality of life
Health status perception was measured with questions that addressed both the physical and mental components of health. Each scale is converted directly into a 0–5 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight, in which 5 represents the highest level.
Subjective well-being
Subjective well-being was evaluated using questions on satisfaction with the level of life, health, personal achievement, personal relationships, social community connection, and future security. The score is the average of the items, varying from 0 to 5, in which higher values represent better subjective well-being.
Statistical analysis
Data collected was analyzed using SPSS version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Descriptive analysis of data was expressed as percentages. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine sociodemographic characteristics of respondents associated with HRQoL. Variables which reached a statistical significance of ≤0.2 in the bivariable models were included in the multivariable analysis. The strength of association was measured using odds ratio and statistical significance assessed using P values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for odds ratio. We considered P < 0.05 statistically significant in the statistical analysis. Good QoL is defined by physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning: nil or limited painful crisis, nil depression, nil emotional stress, and able to function with the society.
Ethical clearance
The study was approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of UNTH. Patients received information about the study and signed an informed consent form after acceptance.
| Results | | |
Sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents
A total of 116 respondents returned questionnaires giving a 100% response rate. Most of the patients were male (59.5%), and majority of them were below the age of 30 years with a mean age of 25.5 ± 6.4 years. In respect to education level, 62.9% had tertiary education, while only 15.5% were married [Table 1].
Clinical characteristics of the respondents
Most of the participants in the study had homozygous SS genotype (84.5%). The diagnosis was first made in childhood in majority of them (84.5%). Majority (69.8%) have been transfused in the past. All the participants experienced complications in the past, while 39.7% had VOC requiring admission between 1 and 3 times per year in the past [Table 2].
Assessment of psychosocial health-related quality of life of the respondents
More than half of the respondents were satisfied with sleep (67.2%), perform daily living activities (50.8%), personal relationship (56.9%), and conditions of living place (62.1%). Less than half of the respondents were satisfied with their sex life (46.6%) and capacity for work (44.8%) [Table 3].
Factors associated with overall quality of life of respondents
[Table 4] shows factors associated with QoL of the respondents.
Of 22 married SCD patients, 18 (81.8%) had a good QoL, while 4 (18.2%) had a poor QoL. On the other hand, 52 (55.3%) of 94 unmarried participants had a good QoL, while 42 (44.7%) had the poor life quality.
After adjusting for age, sex, marital status, level of education, and Hb electrophoresis, the odds for a good QoL were about three times among females compared to males (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =2.64, 95% CI = 0.87–8.00, P = 0.087). The odds for good QoL were about 1.3 times higher among married participants compared to those that were single/separated/divorce (AOR = 1.25, 95%CI = 0.27–5.79, P = 0.773) and about 11.8 times higher among those that had tertiary education compare to those that had only primary education (AOR = 11.87, 95% CI = 2.05–68.84, P = 0.006). However, the odds for QoL were 42% lower among participants with hemoglobin SC (HbSC) compared to those with hemoglobin SS (HbSS) (AOR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.04–9.01, P = 0.701).
| Discussion | | |
This study showed that SCD is associated with restrictions of different characteristics of HRQoL. The findings are similar to the studies conducted in the United Kingdom, the United States of America, Saudi Arabia, and Brazil.[10],[16],[21],[22] These findings concerning gender are similar to the studies done in the Mecca region, Saudi Arabia, and Brazil[23],[24] but were in contradictions to some other studies in the UK and India,[25],[26] Majority of the participants were between the age of 18–30 years of age (68.1%) and had better QoL (64.3%) compared to those older than 30 years (35.7%). This is similar to the findings in the study conducted in Brazil and Saudi Arabia.[24],[27] Surprisingly in this study, those who were single/separated/divorced had a better QoL than those who were married. This is contradictory to the findings reported in some studies.[11],[24],[26] Concerning educational level, majority of the participants 62.9% had tertiary education, while 8.5% had primary education. This high literacy level of the participants might have accounted for high satisfaction with living conditions in this study.
The study revealed that 84.5% of the participants had HbSS and 2.6% had Hamoglobin B thalassemia. This finding is similar to other studies that reported HbSS as the most common.[16],[17],[24] Despite the fact that HbSC trait is largely confined to the Yoruba people of Southwest Nigeria where it appears in about 6%, lower than 12.9% documented in this study.[28] The diagnosis of SCD was made during childhood in 84.5% of the participants, and this early diagnosis might have be as a result of the investigations of the features of the sickle cell crises experienced during the period at health facilities.
Majority of the participants 69.8% had been transfused with blood in the past. This confirmed constant hemolytic process reported among SCD patients. Many complications such as stroke, nephropathy, ulcers, and AVN were reported in the study. About 46.6% of the participants had not experienced any acute complications contrary to the findings in another study where all patients experienced some.[24],[29]
This study showed that 18.1% of the participants never had satisfactory sleep. This could be responsible for other medical problems among the participants. This result is similar to the findings reported in some studies.[21],[23] More than half of the participants (50.8%) always had satisfaction to perform daily living activities, lower than findings in another study where 70% satisfaction was reported.[23] Satisfaction with personal relationship in this study of 19% is higher than 5% reported in another study conducted in Saudi Arabia.[23] This aspect is very important in the QoL among the participants, as this can be related to the level of stigma in the society which has effects on living conditions of individuals. Only 46.6% of the participants had satisfaction with their sex life. The reasons for this poor satisfaction with sex life could be due to some complications experienced by the participants. Concerning access to health services, more than half 58.6% had satisfaction with their access to care. This might be due to a high literacy level of the participants, expected to have better socioeconomic conditions, more so that the study was conducted in urban hospital settings.
This study assessed the factors that are associated with psychosocial HRQoL. The odds for good QoL were about three times higher among females compared to males similar to the findings in the study conducted in Saudi Arabia.[21] It however contradicted some studies that reported poorer QoL among females compared to their male counterparts.[9],[30] The findings in this study could be due to the fact that females were not engaged in rigorous activities, and this might had affected their QoL. The study revealed that the odds for good QoL were about one and half times higher among those older than 30 years compared to those who were between 18 and 30. Surprisingly in this study, the odds for good QoL were about 1.3 times higher among participants who were single/separated/divorced/widowed compared to those who were married. The odds for good life were about 42% less among participants who were HbSS compared to those that were HbSC. Concerning education, the higher the literacy level, the better the QoL. The odds for good QoL were about 10 times better among participants who had secondary education compared to those who had primary education, while they were 12 times higher among those who had tertiary education. The differences could be due to possible higher socioeconomic status.
| Conclusions | | |
It is concluded from this study that adults with SCD have impaired psychosocial QoL. After adjusting for marital status, age, gender, and educational qualification of adults with SCD, only educational status significantly affected the psychosocial HRQoL. There is a need to upscale patient-focused interventions to improve self-esteem and overall QoL.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from Health Research Ethics Committee of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku-Ozalla, Enugu. Informed written consent was obtained from the participants.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants in this study. All the research assistants are acknowledged for the assistance during conduction of this research.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Pecker LH, Little J. Clinical manifestations of sickle cell disease across the lifespan. In: Meier E, Abraham A, Fasano R, editors. Sickle Cell Disease and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Cham: Springer; 2018.  |
| 2. | Platt OS, Brambilla DJ, Milner PF, Rosse WF, Milner PF, Castro O, et al. Mortality in sickle cell disease: Life expectancy and risk factors for early death. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1639-44. |
| 3. | Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. Curr Concept 1996;334:835-40. |
| 4. | Ware JE Jr., Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83. |
| 5. | Bhagat VM, Baviskar SR, Mudey AB, Goyal RC. Poor health related quality of life among patients of sickle cell disease. Indian J Palliative Care 2014;20:107-11. |
| 6. | Ferrans CE. Quality of life: Making sense of a multidimensional concept. Nurse Investigator 1995;2:9. |
| 7. | Karimeldin MA. The impact of sickle cell anaemia on the quality of life of sicklers at school age. J Fam Med Primary Care 2019;8:468-71. |
| 8. | Thomas VJ, Taylor LM. The psychosocial experience of people with sickle cell disease and its impact on quality of life: Qualitative findings from focus groups. Br J Health Psychol 2002;7:345-63. |
| 9. | Fuggle P, Shand PA, Gill LJ, Davies SC. Pain, quality of life, and coping in sickle cell disease. Arch Dis Child 1996;75:199-203. |
| 10. | Anie KA, Steptoe A, Bevan D. Sickle cell disease: Pain, coping and quality of life in a study of adults in the UK. Br J Health Psychol 2002;7:331-44. |
| 11. | Kambasu DM, Rujumba J, Lekuya HM, Munube D, Muperre E. Health-related quality of life of adolescents with sickle cell disease in sub-Saharan Africa: A cross-sectional study. BMC Haematol 2019;19:1-9. |
| 12. | Ramsey LT, Woods KF, Callahan LA, Mensay GA, Barbeau P, Gutin B. Quality of life improvement for patients with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 2001;66:155-6. |
| 13. | Anie KA, Egunjobi FE, Akinyanju OO. Psychosocial impact of sickle cell disorder: Perspectives from a Nigerian setting. Globalization Health 2010;6:2. |
| 14. | Levenson JL, McClish DK, Dahman BA, Bovbjerg VE, de Citero VA, Penberthy LT et al. Depression and anxiety in adults with sickle cell disease: The PiSCES Project. Psychosomat Med 2008;70:192-6. |
| 15. | Thompson RJ, Gil KM, Abrams MR, Phillips G. Stress, coping, and psychological adjustment of adults with sickle cell disease. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992;60:433-40. |
| 16. | McClish DK, Penberthy LT, Bovbjerk VE, Roberts JD, Aisiku IP, Levenson JL, et al. Health related quality of life in sickle cell patients. The PiSCES Project. Health Q Life Outcomes 2005;3:50. |
| 17. | Carlton D, Petra L, Seungshin R. Health- related quality of life in adults with sickle cell disease (SCD): A report from the comprehensive sickle cell centers clinical trial consortium. Am J Hematol 2011;86:203-5. |
| 18. | Araújo JT. Inter- American Symposium on Hemoglobins: Genetic, Functional and Physical Studies on Hemoglobins. Geographical Distribution and Accident of Hemoglobins in Brazil. Caracas; 1971. |
| 19. | Alvim RC. Profile and impact of pain in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease: An experimental clinical study of the effect of piracetam in the prevention of pain crises. Belo Horizonte: Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais; 2002. |
| 20. | Bunn FH. Pathogenesis and treatment of sickle cell disease. N Engl J Med 1997;337:762-9. |
| 21. | Amr MA, Amin Uvedi P; Epidemiology of, Al-Omair OA. Health related quality of life among adolescents with sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Pan Afr Med J 2011;8:10. |
| 22. | Menezes AP, Len CA, Hilario MO, Terreri MT, Braga JA. Quality of life in patients with sickle cell disease. Rev Paul Pediatr 2013;3:21-7. |
| 23. | Alharbi EA, Alamri RF, AlJerayan ES, Salawati HS, Al-Mjershi SM. Quality of life assessment for children with sickle cell disease (SCD) in Mecca region. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2016;5:901-5. |
| 24. | Vilela RQ, Cavalcante JC, Cavalcante BF, Araujo DL, Lobo MD, Nunes FA. Quality of life of individuals with sickle cell disease followed at referral centers in Alagoas, Brazil. Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter 2012;34:442-6. |
| 25. | Constantinou C, Payne N, Inusa B. Assessing the quality of life of children with sickle cell anaemia using self, parent-proxy, and health care professional-proxy reports. Br J Health Psychol 2015;20:290-304. |
| 26. | Kamble M, Chatruvedi P. Epidemiology of sickle cell disease in a rural hospital of central India. Indian Pediatr 2000;37:391-6. |
| 27. | Ahmed AE, Alaskar AS, Al-Suliman AM, Jazieh AR, McClish DK, Salah MA, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with sickle cell disease in Saudi Arabia. Health Q Life Outcomes 2015;13:183-92. |
| 28. | Akinyanju OO. A profile of sickle cell disease in Nigeria. Ann NY Acad Sci 1989;565:126-36. |
| 29. | Nwogoh B, Ofovwe CE, Omoti CE. Health related quality of life in sickle cell disease subjects in Benin City. Afr J Med Health Sci 2016;15:80-5. [Full text] |
| 30. | James V, Tasha B, Micheal S. The PedsQL 4 0 as a school population health measure: Feasibility, reliability, and validity. Q Life Res 2006;15:203-15. |
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]
|
